RE: Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
December 16, 2010 at 7:04 pm
(This post was last modified: December 16, 2010 at 9:14 pm by Anomalocaris.)
Oh, please. Your ability to name a competitor is the crux of the question. Scientific/methodological naturalism can demonstrate certain efficacy in establishing truth claims. It assesses its own relative efficiacy to other competing systems by observation. The inability of even one single motivated hecklers like you to even begin to demonstrate comparable efficacy in alternate epistemology is the basis for Scientific/methodological naturalism to establish the working hypothesis that itself is the single most effective epistemology for establishing truth claims yet propounded.
If you are unable to name a credible competitor, then stop heckling those who would postulate Scientific/methodological naturalism to be unsurpassed and unrivaled.
If you are unable to name a credible competitor, then stop heckling those who would postulate Scientific/methodological naturalism to be unsurpassed and unrivaled.