RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
November 2, 2015 at 11:17 am
(This post was last modified: November 2, 2015 at 11:33 am by Homeless Nutter.)
(November 2, 2015 at 10:08 am)Little Rik Wrote: [...]What would you describe something as the mind and consciousness that you can not touch, see, hear, smell and taste?
If it is not something physical what else it is other than abstract?[...]
You cannot touch, see, hear, smell or taste carbon monoxide, a deadly gas - does that mean it's "abstract"? Hmmm?



Words have meaning, dumbass - and you're using them wrong. I told you what "abstract" means - and it's not what you think it means. You fail to grasp what words like "science", "evidence", "atheism" and "hinduism-based sect" mean either - among many others. No wonder you're confused.

You're just parroting random "smart-sounding" words you don't understand, like a child, trying to impress adults. Well done...



"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw