I can't help but think that some saying this woman should keep her children would also ask for heads of authorities should something happen to her current kids.
Having knowledge of what happened, would any reasonable person let this woman baby sit for them? Why then should she be allowed to be the primary care giver for any living thing?
What does she tell her future kids when they are old enough to understand and learn what she did? Would the kid then have the right to choose to live elsewhere (let's say age 13).
As Rob Alluded to earlier, the idea that the woman should keep these kids because the current brood are not injured or dead yet is preposterous. She watched as her three children drowned in relatively (4.5') shallow water. I wouldn't let her have a pet hamster.
Having knowledge of what happened, would any reasonable person let this woman baby sit for them? Why then should she be allowed to be the primary care giver for any living thing?
What does she tell her future kids when they are old enough to understand and learn what she did? Would the kid then have the right to choose to live elsewhere (let's say age 13).
As Rob Alluded to earlier, the idea that the woman should keep these kids because the current brood are not injured or dead yet is preposterous. She watched as her three children drowned in relatively (4.5') shallow water. I wouldn't let her have a pet hamster.
