In a way, legally, it's the future that really matters: is she likely to harm her children again?
Of course, this depends heavily on the past and present. She was complicit in the murder of her children, which counsels against her, she refuses to take medication, which counsels against her... in my view, this should probably be enough to remove the children from her custody. I don't know if it is. But I think it should be. Very few legal principals are given more weight than "best interests of the child."
Of course, this depends heavily on the past and present. She was complicit in the murder of her children, which counsels against her, she refuses to take medication, which counsels against her... in my view, this should probably be enough to remove the children from her custody. I don't know if it is. But I think it should be. Very few legal principals are given more weight than "best interests of the child."
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.
