Should this womans past matter?

[Aroura]

So, this one is being examined, they did not just take her kids and call it done.

So far, evidence reveals that the current father is violent, and that both parents have substance abuse issues.
The mother is not doing any of her recommended mental health treatments.

I'm pretty sure the judge will take away the kids and rightly so.

If the new father was a poor, blue collar worker with no history of violence and no current substance abuse, and mom was going to regular counseling, then yeah, MAYBE she could be allowed to have them back. But that isn't the case.

Past history: Stood by and watched boyfriend murder children, did nothing while they SCREAMED FOR MINUTES FOR HELP IN A LOCKED CAR before drowning.
Current situation: Father of kids has history of domestic violence, and both parents use illegal drugs. Do we need to wait for serious neglect or abuse to happen in this case before the kids are taken away? I THINK NOT.

Dianne Downs (I admit, actively) killed her kids so she could get a man. When she got preggers again, the courts didn't wait to see if she'd learned her lesson this time. This case already has precedent, and the precedent is to protect the kids.

I'm not a judgmental person. I do not believe in the death penalty, and I think our entire "justice" system needs a major overhaul, but in this case, child services was absolutely right to take the kids away first and ask questions later.