I didn't say everything requires evidence because I was of course talking about claims about reality. About existence claims.
Now you're just trying to find an excuse to move on it appears.
And no you didn't say that maths was the same as faith; it's just when I said it doesn't need evidence for it's own existence in outside objective reality - but it does evidently help us accurately understand the world...
You said faith does that too. It helps us accurately understand the world.
And I am now asking: How exactly does it? How does 'belief without evidence' help us understand the world exactly? And why would faith in certain things be more logical, rational, correct than others in any way?
Now you're just trying to find an excuse to move on it appears.
And no you didn't say that maths was the same as faith; it's just when I said it doesn't need evidence for it's own existence in outside objective reality - but it does evidently help us accurately understand the world...
You said faith does that too. It helps us accurately understand the world.
And I am now asking: How exactly does it? How does 'belief without evidence' help us understand the world exactly? And why would faith in certain things be more logical, rational, correct than others in any way?