(November 15, 2015 at 1:26 pm)robvalue Wrote: No, I'm saying it's stupid to say you know loads of things about God while not giving any evidence as to how you could possibly know any of it (or even that it exists at all).
It comes down to what we consider to be evidence Rob. I see the existence of life as evidence to support my belief in God. I see his intervention in my life as evidence for his existence. I see the testimonies of others as to how he has worked in their lives as evidence. You have your criteria as to what it would take to make you believe, and these things don't meet that criteria. Okay. I agree that these things are not evidence according to how you define evidence, but you can't go inside others and experience what they experience. It is also true that if you are unwilling to step outside the boundaries of natural sciences, then you won't experience God because God is outside the boundaries of natural science, and that's your prerogative to do so.
