I will not comment heavily in this thread since i do not have the time nor the relevant knowledge, however i find the "global flood" argument a pure example of the "and then a miracle happens" argument: the global flood is used by creationists to justify everything, from radiocarbon dating to continental drift and fossils of waterborne creatures in mountains. Without ever actually proving that this flood ever happened in the first place.
Creationists use this argument as an alternative to a divine intervention with the guise of appearing scientific. And i find it amusing how creationists constantly refer to this flood without providing any actual evidence for it.
I also find amusing that creationists still have never managed to prove that Evolution can"t work.
Creationists use this argument as an alternative to a divine intervention with the guise of appearing scientific. And i find it amusing how creationists constantly refer to this flood without providing any actual evidence for it.
I also find amusing that creationists still have never managed to prove that Evolution can"t work.
