RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
November 16, 2015 at 7:53 am
(This post was last modified: November 16, 2015 at 7:54 am by Ben Davis.)
Hi Rik, I'm going to try one last time but since you've not been responding to my messages, this might be a complete waste of time.
Here's to hoping
Here's to hoping
(November 15, 2015 at 3:20 am)Little Rik Wrote: You guys say that atheism is not unscientific but science contradict you at every step.No. No-one has said that. The only comment made about that has been that atheism has nothing to do with science as it's only the disbelief in theistic propositions.
Quote:Physically speaking the rule is that a clever and bright mind can only be such when the body is healthy.Stephen Hawking would have words with you about that.
Quote:By introducing rubbish in your body such as smoke, booze, drugs, meat and so on the chances that your body and mind can be in top nick are very very slim and considering that most of you don't care about it show how unscientific you are.So smoking etc. are 'atheistic' practices are they? And all atheists are smokers etc.? Really? Are you really claiming that?
Quote:The evidence?You have none. None. You're making things up.
Quote:You think that the mind can do so many things but you don't even understand the differences between outer mind and inner mind so how the hell can you hope to make any progress in this place?No, you don't understand the way the mind works. You've demonstrated this with every comment you've made about how you think the mind works. It's not even as if you're the type of woo-merchant who takes modern scientific discovery and twists it in to something woo-ish, you simply lie to people and claim esotericism as your defense. That's despicable.
Quote:No progress of whatsoever and then you have the audacity to say that it is me that is in denial.I'll say again; physician, heal thyself.
Quote:Science contradict you guys so you lost.Science doesn't contradict the 'atheist' position in any way because atheism, as you've been told a hundred times or more, has no doctrine, let alone one that refers specifically to science. However, you know what science can do? It can demonstrate that specific claims, made about gods, are false. It's been doing this for a long time now.
Sum ergo sum