RE: Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
December 28, 2010 at 12:30 pm
(This post was last modified: December 28, 2010 at 12:32 pm by Captain Scarlet.)
(December 27, 2010 at 9:43 pm)Statler Wrote: I find you equally amusing. You just assert I commit fallacies but don’t point them out. Sad but not surprising.You are joking, right? Some have already been pointed out previously and there is a real long list every time your post.
All your arguments so far asserts is that if evolution is false then creation is more likely true; that is a bifurcation. You seek to assert your own credentials and run down other peoples in ad hominem attacks. C14 argument is an argument from incredulity. There are plenty of others.
As of my credentials, would you care to point out where I show an obvious lack of scientific knowledge/training? Which you are asserting without knowledge nor specificity. Can you also explain what you mean when you say a 'secular colleague', (on the assumption you are talking about a scientist). By definition science is secular because it is based on methodological naturalism, not supernaturalism and therefore the term is redundant.
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.