Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)

[Ashendant]

Actually it’s a pretty established law, by information theorists, that information never arises devoid of a mental or intelligent source. The body’s ability to replicate (not create) DNA and interpret it is itself written in the DNA. So this would be like saying an operating system has no mental source because there are pieces in it that interpret its code for it. We have never created any piece of code that can come close to matching the scale and information holding power of DNA, to say it arose by natural means is pretty absurd.

If this law that all information can be traced back to a mental source were not valid then it would destroy the fields of archeology and anthropology because they use it all the time.

Isn't that the opposite of the conclusion that should be taken, that if we can't create information that large by artificial means, but nature can, isn't it saying that it's perfectly natural that it did so, also nature had a longer time than us and much of the information contained is useless crap, mostly of it caused by rouge genetic programs called Virus.

And no it wouldn't destroy archeology and anthropology study, because they are the studies of Humanity, not the studies of the source of all information.

Also we already found connections bet north American indians and french people that date 20.000 years old, so the earth can't be that young.

and finally you still failed to prove why young earth creationism is true