(November 17, 2015 at 12:36 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:(November 17, 2015 at 12:24 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Experience on AF has taught me that atheist members have only cursory understanding of Aquinas and base their objections on arguments that Aquinas never made. Your claim to understand them perfectly guarantees that you do not. Only if you had 1) you could you gain 2).So your objection to my assertion is based on your experience with other people. This is the same with Drich and his A/S/K nonsense. If it didn't work you didn't do it right. Intellectual honesty: not your bag, Chad. And this opinion is based on my experiences with you, not with others.
You are always free to prove me wrong and demonstrate your comprehensive knowledge of Thomas Aquinas; although, obviously you are under no obligation to do so. You can just say so but why should anyone believe you. Metis claimed to be a divinity student and expert on Aquinas, yet everyone agrees that his performance was an utter failure.
Intellectual honesty?....hmmm...what does that really mean anyway?
