(November 17, 2015 at 4:15 pm)The_Empress Wrote: Obviously, you don't know, because you still refuse to acknowledge that Metis' "performance" was an utter failure because we caught him plagiarizing, not because Aquinas' 5 ways are so compelling. I took an entire class in college about Aquinas from a professor who was borderline obsessed with the guy; got an A and everything, so obviously I understand it pretty well. I still don't think the arguments are at all valid.
Whether Metis plagiarized is irrelevant because he presents the exact same straw man arguments I hear repeated all all over AF. Those straw man arguments are bogus regardless of from where they come.
