RE: What is illogical? Nothing?
December 29, 2010 at 4:29 pm
(This post was last modified: December 29, 2010 at 4:31 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
So if a logical contradiction is "illogical" why do we call it a logical contradiction and not an illogical one?
A statement's logic can be logically inaccurate in the thing it refers to, yes of course.... I am just saying that everything that actually EXISTS in itself must necessarily be logical. Where is this definition any less useful? In fact I think it's more useful because it's more specific and it also makes more sense because we speak of "logical contradictions" and not "illogical contradictions" (An illogical contradiction couldn't logically contradict anything because it couldn't logically do (or be) anything because it would be illogical and not logical).
A statement's logic can be logically inaccurate in the thing it refers to, yes of course.... I am just saying that everything that actually EXISTS in itself must necessarily be logical. Where is this definition any less useful? In fact I think it's more useful because it's more specific and it also makes more sense because we speak of "logical contradictions" and not "illogical contradictions" (An illogical contradiction couldn't logically contradict anything because it couldn't logically do (or be) anything because it would be illogical and not logical).
