(November 18, 2015 at 10:04 pm)heatiosrs Wrote:(November 18, 2015 at 9:49 pm)Cato Wrote: You should Google "No means yes, yes means anal".Um
Trailer for an apropos documentary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBNHGi36nlM
Envision an outdoor sporting event in the middle of summer, let's say temperature above 95F. The fattest, hairiest, nastiest person with five appendages has no problem pealing down to near nudity in an attempt to cool off, but a four appendage person does the same and people will lose their shit for various reasons. You suggest that you don't think that's "the way it should be, but the way it is". It's precisely 'the way it is' that feminism attempts to change.
I don't understand what you're saying
All i'm saying is that an attractive woman wearing hardly any clothes is much more likely to be targeted for rape because of the attention she is already drawing to herself.
That is the harsh reality. We are drawn to people who are.."pleasing" to look at.
Obviously a disabled person is less likely to be looked at in the way that a very attractive and naturally beautiful person is. There's really no way to change that, it's human nature, it's not the way it should be, everyone should be treated equal, but just because you are looking at the attractive person over the non-attractive person does not mean you are making a statement that she is not equal in comparison. You are simply preferring the outside appearance of someone over the other, we are all drawn toward different people, but a majority of the time, it's people who are "pleasing" to look at. It's not your human right to be seen equally to someone, everyone has different body structures, so yes, that's the way it is.
I tried really hard to not sound awkward while writing that, but I would like to not comment on this issue anymore.
It's not a reality though. I don't think rapists are like mm she's hot and has less clothes than the others so I'll take her.
