(November 18, 2015 at 11:00 pm)heatiosrs Wrote:(November 18, 2015 at 10:55 pm)The_Empress Wrote: Heatiosrs, do you understand the burden of proof?Yes, I do.
Do you understand agnosticism?
Yeah, that was a right hook.
Here's what I didn't say:
"This is the only thing that happens and I don't need to provide proof for it."
"This is what's true, and all that can be"
Here's what I did say:
"In my opinion I think most of the time this is what happens, although i'm not saying this cannot also be the case"
So go fuck yourself for misrepresenting what I said so many times.
Excuse me? Please quote me where I misrepresented you.
This is not about opinions. This is about facts, and the facts are that levels of attractiveness and provocative dress have no correlation to instances of rape. It's that simple. The burden of proof lies on you, the one claiming they do have a correlation, to prove it. Cato provided you links to show there isn't one, now it's up to you to prove there is.
Again, I'm an intensively trained SART advocate, so it had better be good, and not just your "opinion".
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
