(November 19, 2015 at 12:04 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:(November 19, 2015 at 2:59 am)Evie Wrote: Already told you. The philosopher Immanuel Kant debunked Aquinas. Go and debunk Kant, quote his arguments and then come back and post them on a thread and show us how much more logical you are than Kant.Get your shit together, Evie. Kant didn't agree with Aquinas. That means that Kant didn't understand Aquinas.
The way things usually work is that a member will present in their own words the arguments made by those with whom they agree, like Kant for example. This way, the other party doesn't have to guess at what the original member considers applicable.
Congratulations, though. At least you have identified one serious objection to Aquinas, shared by Aristotle, Hume, Kant, Frege and Russell. The idea, as I understand it is that 'existence' is not a property in itself. Now, would you care to present that argument yourself or are you content to make an argument from authority?
