Poland plans to turn Syrian refugees into a resistance army to fight Isis

[Dystopia]

That's normal in a country that is very ethnically homogeneous. Seriously, it's like asking Japan to take in Syrian refugees and being surprised they said "no". I'm not disagreeing with you on anything this time, I'm just noting that it was expected. And sorry for the derail, but aren't you Austrian and isn't Austria with a strong far-right movement? I say this because you're always complaining about the far-right.

Yes, pukeworthy. And your statement about "ethnically homogenous" is right up their avenue. So you shouldn't be surprised why I have you labeled. It's bullshit, of course, since the countries taking in refugees in greater number are what you're calling ethnically homogenous too. So, it rather has more to do with attitude and a general disregard for people in need. Which, again, isn't that surprising for the far right.

When I say ethnically homogeneous, I don't mean 80-90% similar, I mean something like 95%-99% as it is the case with Japan.

Please, I have never said anything too revealing about me, and there's things I will never tell people here other than one or two by PM, but if there's something most should know is that my policies are not based on people's ethnicity. You can't change your ethnicity, it's wrong to judge people because of it. The only thing it does is to give people a sense of identity, so everyone who looks themselves on the mirror knows they have X or Y origins of Z ancestors. My girlfriend of 3 years is part gipsy, I have said this many times. If I was really a racist I would never date someone who is according to racists mud-blood. Nazis will never be my friends and I'll never be friends of them. That doesn't mean I can't have other controversial positions, but certainly not based on ethnicity. My country is a very diverse ethnic group by itself, which I find great.

The term I used is the most accurate to describe a country where the majority of the population identifies as the same ethnicity. There is nothing wrong with that.

BTW, do you use far-right to describe all your opponents? Do you realize how blurry the line is between far-right and far-left? Do you also notice that far-right is a diverse group? For example, there's rightists who believe race entails superiority, and then there's integralists who believe interracial relationships are perfectly fine. There's rightists who think eugenics is great, and there's others who disagree. There's rightists who think religion, specially Christianity, should be State sponsored, and there's rightists who think religious belief should be supressed and that religion is stupid, etc. You can't simply make broad statements without evidence.

Also, since disregard for people in need is so bad can I assume that I'm a bad person because I literally never give money to homeless people who have no means of survival? How many people am I forced to help? Also, isn't it disregard for people in need for Germany to force countries with smaller economics to have austerity and hurt employment rates?