I always love it when the creationists toss out the "in situ" explanation for starlight propagation to explain the universe "looking" old when it is only 6000 years old.
They always fail to extrapolate to the logical conclusion that if this is indeed the case then their god is the greatest deceiver of all (satan can only look on in jealous admiration).
And if their god is such a monumental liar how can we trust anything else he says?
Also if it is all "created" why did god feel the necessity to create supernova remnants?
That would be like building a new house and putting broken light bulbs in it
They always fail to extrapolate to the logical conclusion that if this is indeed the case then their god is the greatest deceiver of all (satan can only look on in jealous admiration).
And if their god is such a monumental liar how can we trust anything else he says?
Also if it is all "created" why did god feel the necessity to create supernova remnants?
That would be like building a new house and putting broken light bulbs in it
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
