Attack at Planned Parenthood Clinic

[Mr.wizard]

I don't agree with the argument that a cancerous tumor has no right to be in a smoker's lung. If it grew there, that is exactly where it's supposed to be. That is how nature was designed to work, that is how it was all intended to be.

I know I'm just restating what Cathy already said, but talking like a cancerous tumor has no business being in a smoker's lungs just sounds silly to me, so I figured I'd comment.



(This is also known as the naturalistic fallacy, in case you didn't know.)

... This was good, actually. This shows the fundamental difference between our thinking, and really, the root of the argument. 

That argument being this: is an unborn entity with human DNA a human being? Since you are comparing him/her to a cancerous tumor, I'd say you probably don't think so. I do. And so if we wanted to have a well organized, thorough debate on abortion, we'd have to start there.

No No No, the argument is about a person having a choice about what goes on within their own body, the choice is the persons regardless of if its a tumor or a fetus.