Why am I an agnostic atheist? I don't know!

[Ace Otana]

-----
Ok, this shall be my last attempt at this.
Now no matter how many times I read it, it just doesn't add up. Since last night, I think I now know why.
This fallacy thing seems to be stemming from the utterly pointless questions and answers given. Let me explain.

"Why don't you know of a valid reason to believe in God?"

This question is utterly pointless. So it is to be expected that the answer is too. And it is.
The whole point of asking a question is to gain new data/information in order to gain knowledge and to better understand. Now, this question "Why don't you know of a valid reason to believe in God?" is pretty much meaningless. The answer in response to the question is just as pointless - "Because I know of no valid evidence". It's pointless because no new data/information can be gained from this. So both the question and answer are as I see it, completely pointless and so thus leads it into this silly fallacy. They are both just as pointless.

Conclusion: You don't know why you don't believe and nor do I.

Once I read this little bit, I knew it didn't add up. Thing is, when someone is asking why I don't believe in something and I respond to that question, you'll notice that both the question and answer have a point to it. The answer is with new information. It's once you ask the most pointless question that leads to a most pointless answer that leads nowhere but a pointless circle.
Something didn't add up and I spotted it. It's the questions and the answers given. They make no sense.

I shall demonstrate this.

"Why is X annoyed?" "because X is angry" and "Why is X angry?" "Because X is annoyed"

There is a pointless answer in this. Can you spot it?
Here I'll high light it in red.

"Why is X annoyed?" "because X is angry" and "Why is X angry?" "Because X is annoyed"
First there is a question, no problems here, then there is a pointless answer in response to the question, here is where it falls. Now the answer given for the question made makes no sense. In fact, it is nothing more than a repeat of the question, and so the answer given is pointless. No new data/information is contained within the answer.
The "why is X angry" question was asking for new data/information, a repeat of the first question would lead to a pointless answer since nothing is gained. I've noticed that this fallacy only pops up once a pointless question or answer has been given.
So when I respond to the question "why don't I believe" with a "because there is no evidence" I have given a proper answer to the question at hand. I know why I don't believe. The question and answer have point. This silly fallacy keeps stemming from an utterly pointless question or answer. If you take away the pointless question, you'll notice it makes sense again.

"Why do I know of no evidence?" is a pointless question. It will lead to a pointless answer and so creates this pointless loop.

"This pen is red because it's red". This is also pointless. You see where I'm going with this right?
So yes I can answer why I don't believe and as you should see, the question that asks of the reason for my lack of belief makes sense. The answer I give in response to the question also makes sense. There is no loop. This loop only seems to occur when a pointless question or answer had been given.

So because can't answer either of those questions without committing a fallacy

You can't give an answer to the question without giving it a completely pointless answer. Thus creates the fallacy.

The problem lies in the questions given. If the question makes no sense, all that stem from it is liable to make just as little sense.

Just to make sure we are clear on this -.

"Why don't I believe in God?" "Because I'm unconvinced." "Why am I unconvinced?" "Because I don't believe".

You can see where it starts to make no sense. The last answer was completely pointless. It was repeating itself.

There! Now old chap. I'm off up town to go find some girls to flirt with.