RE: Attack at Planned Parenthood Clinic
December 1, 2015 at 9:05 pm
(This post was last modified: December 1, 2015 at 9:05 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(December 1, 2015 at 8:49 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:(December 1, 2015 at 6:32 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Yes, it would be permissible for you to kill a parasite or tapeworm. I don't know why that means it should also be ok to kill a human fetus. In no other argument do we use our treatment of animals (let alone of parasites) as a standard for how we should treat humans. It's ok to kill a tapeworm living in your intestines just as it is ok to kill a fish you're going to eat. The same cannot be said about humans, for either count.
...Unless of course, you are saying that a human fetus is not human. Again, if that's the case then we would need to take this discussion all the way back to the question of a fetuses' humanity. It's pointless to talk about this if we haven't settled that step yet. We are way ahead of ourselves.
We're way ahead of you in our grasp on morality. It would be you who would be flaunting that word all over everwhere, and still not having a clue as to what it really means.
The parasite in question is you. You reject reality-based morality in favor of continually feeding your addiction to fairy-tale horrors. You insult everyone who you talk to about the issue with outrageously twisted apologetics for your lobbying against the rights against actual breathing people, just so that you can feel like you are pleasing your imagined fairy godfather. For this, you are beneath contempt!
Alllllriht then, nice to meet you. Welcome to the forums, friend! Wanna hook up?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
