(December 1, 2015 at 7:42 pm)Aroura Wrote:(December 1, 2015 at 7:35 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: All life is sacred, of course. And yes, I believe that killing an animal for food is justifiable, but killing them because you don't want to take care of them is not.I see, so it is the tasty option.
Would you be ok with the cat abortion if the remains had been used as food? A lot of people in the east eat cat. I personally don't ever want to try it, but it is a thing.
What about killing animals to feed to other animals? For instance, if the aborted fetuses were fed to living cats? Because it would have been for food, that would have been ok, then.
Also...I assume this rule about killing for food does not extend to humans, even though we are technically animals. You mean non-human animals, correct? Just clarifying the cannibalism loop-hole here.
What about you, Aroura? We never talk anymore since I stopped having time for mafia. How would you answer all these questions?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
