RE: Atheism. The UNscientific belief (part two)
December 2, 2015 at 9:18 am
(This post was last modified: December 2, 2015 at 9:23 am by Homeless Nutter.)
(December 2, 2015 at 7:49 am)Little Rik Wrote: [...]
Those who had NDEs experiences are normal decent people not on drugs not on daydreams.
Why they should lie?
[...]
To brighten up a difficult time in their lives with some fantasy. To give some false hope to the loved ones. To get attention of dishonest imbeciles, desperate to prove the existence of an afterlife and sell some books or other magical bullsh*t. To become famous for a while and make some money selling the story to the press. There are ALWAYS reasons to lie.
But of course - many of them don't have to lie, at least not knowingly. They just had a dream, or a hallucination and then many, many days, weeks, or months later when they're asked about the experience (because, you see, it's never been possible to ask a NDE survivor about the experience immediately after they had it, it's always a looong time later; the time they spend mostly doing what? Oh, that's right - SLEEPING) they simply interpret the memory of the dream, colorizing it with details from their culture, like religious stories, or TV and movies.
Oh, yeah - and most of them are in hospitals, when they're remembering their NDEs, so yeah - they are on f***ing drugs.
So no - you have no credible evidence, just some dreams and fantasies.
Not to mention the fact, that "NEAR DEATH" IS NOT "DEATH", dumbass. You didn't think about it, did you?
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
