(December 1, 2015 at 9:11 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Wow guys. I was NOT talking about sex/rape at alllll.
I know you weren't, I was restating your argument in that way to show why one should not depend on the naturalistic fallacy as justification for one's position. I was not intending to insinuate that you somehow supported or condoned rape, I know you don't. I was intending to show how that kind of argument (using the naturalistic fallacy), with only a few changes of words, can be used to justify both what people consider a moral position or behavior (a pro-life stance) and what people consider an immoral position or behavior (something like rape) in the same way I used it before (see the post with the Mr. Bean pic).
I've already PM'd Cathy but I wanted to let anyone who might be expecting a response from me know that I need to stop posting in this thread (personal reasons). I'm sorry if you were hoping I'd respond, under other circumstances I would have stayed, but I really need to not participate in this thread anymore.

Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.