Quote:Well I was hoping you’d be man enough to admit you were wrong about your first assertion that creationists don’t realize this issue, however I am not surprised you didn’t. They have several proposed solutions to the problem, Anisotropic Synchrony Convention, the Gravitational Well Model, and Moshe Carmeli’s Cosmological Model. These are just three of the more popular models which can account for light from distant stars reaching Earth in a very short period of time.
None of which explains the current rate and types of stellar evolution. So tell us, Statler, have you ever spent even one minute inside of a real observatory? Do you even know how a digital camera works? How about a spectrograph? Please explain how these stars (all of which are found within our solar system, some of which, like M1 itself, is already dead) were formed in 6 days:
I took this photo Tuesday. How can these stars form in six days, and yet suddenly slow by orders of maginitude their evolution miraculously as soon as we start looking at them?
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero