RE: Evidence that God exists
March 6, 2009 at 10:11 pm
(This post was last modified: March 6, 2009 at 10:21 pm by fr0d0.)
@ Adrian:
You know I don't think science is relevant to the subject. Science would only serve to focus on the truth, or that which was outside empirical evidence.
A 'truth' is that the garden of eden story accurately describes the human condition.
I have mentioned 'empirical' quite a few times though.
You know I don't think science is relevant to the subject. Science would only serve to focus on the truth, or that which was outside empirical evidence.
A 'truth' is that the garden of eden story accurately describes the human condition.
EvF Wrote:Fr0d0 you now say that the bible is evidence for God. You just meant there is no empirical evidence. Now when you said that it is ridiculous to require evidence for God - I thought you meant evidence altogether. You never mentioned empirical then.Apologies EvF for my 'looseness' LOL
I have mentioned 'empirical' quite a few times though.
(March 6, 2009 at 10:10 pm)Demonaura Wrote: My little interjection, outside of time is a copout excuse for outside of science. Time is a human made model to begin with.The idea is accepted by scientists I believe.
(March 6, 2009 at 10:10 pm)Demonaura Wrote: Humans cannot become perfect, nothing can btw it's not a human condition.Perfect in what way?
(March 6, 2009 at 10:10 pm)Demonaura Wrote: The Garden Of Eden story is intended to put guilt to your name.That's one way of looking at it. I see it as amazing potential. You'd think it'd be the other way around wouldn't you? I mean you'd think you, as a non believer couldn't give a rat's ass, and me as believer would be quaking in my boots.
