(December 6, 2015 at 11:07 am)Irrational Wrote:(December 5, 2015 at 11:30 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I'd agree, there is a distinction between absolute/relativism and objective/subjective, although sometimes the line is quite fuzzy. In this context, I suppose it would the question of relative to what? I didn't write the article, but I would think it more accurate if subjectivism was used. Although I don't know that I have heard a relative position, that was not also subjective.
The thing is that moral subjectivism doesn't require that one agree with everyone else's moral standards.
I concur.... A moral subjectivist doesn't have to like or agree with another's moral standard. Their positions are equally valid however, so their is no foundation for judgement.