RE: Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)
January 9, 2011 at 7:51 am
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2011 at 8:12 am by Zen Badger.)
P.s you have yet to explain the necessity for your god to create supernova remnants and other astronomical phenomena that suggest an old universe(colliding galaxies for instance).
Even more examples of his apparent duplicity.
Ooh,ooh,ooh, I know this one!
According to some creationists, during the time of the great flood the continental plates were seperating at the rate of thousands of miles an hour, then slowed down afterwards.
Failing of course to appreciate the fact that the energy required to accelerate the billions tons of granite etc to the requistite velocities in such a sort time would've A/ evaporated the waters of the Great Flood, B/ killed Noah and his menagerie and C/ most likely shattered the planet.
Still, no more idiotic than anisotropic light propagation I suppose
Even more examples of his apparent duplicity.
orogenicman Wrote:Statler, please describe how YEC explains away the fact that paleomagnetism and other evidence demonstrates that the ocean floors are vastly older than can be accounted for by the Genesis account of the age of the Earth.
Ooh,ooh,ooh, I know this one!
According to some creationists, during the time of the great flood the continental plates were seperating at the rate of thousands of miles an hour, then slowed down afterwards.
Failing of course to appreciate the fact that the energy required to accelerate the billions tons of granite etc to the requistite velocities in such a sort time would've A/ evaporated the waters of the Great Flood, B/ killed Noah and his menagerie and C/ most likely shattered the planet.
Still, no more idiotic than anisotropic light propagation I suppose
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.