Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Redbeard The Pink]

Ok, now you're literally just gibbering out word salad. Again.


There's no evidence that the Universe is a creation at all. It might not have a creator. Evidence seems to indicate that we certainly don't need one to explain how the Universe got here.
There's no evidence that the Universe is moving toward a more "conscious" state. Living organisms sometimes evolve better brains with higher consciousness as they adapt to conditions around them, but there's no evidence that anything else is "going up," as you describe. The Universe isn't moving toward consciousness, it's moving toward equilibrium. You know what equilibrium is, right?
Oh, who am I kidding? Of course you don't.

Holy, holy, holy Santa.  
Why you are so mean to me beanie by asking me such a hard question?  
Now i am in real trouble?
Who will helping me?  
I always thought that equilibrium means balance and for balance i intend a stage in which the positive and negative are in perfect equilibrium but no your deep philosophical question must intend something much more deep that that.  
But just in case that LR is correct that means that your logic get flushed down the toilet because anyone looking for more consciousness are not happy with a situation of equilibrium.  
They want progress not equilibrium which is a stage of no progress no regress.  
So no beanie once again you are left down in the gutter which is worse than equilibrium.  

You're so god-damn dumb, Rik. How do you even remember to breathe? Seriously. Do they give you some kind of breathing machine to make sure you don't forget?


That definition of equilibrium, like your neural pathways, is vastly oversimplified. When I talk about Universal equilibrium, I'm referring to a balance of ALL natural energy (temperature, charge, gravity, inertia, etc.). I'm not making reference to a balance between your imaginary friends, Yin and Yang.