(December 8, 2015 at 6:36 am)Little Rik Wrote:(December 7, 2015 at 10:29 am)Redbeard The Pink Wrote: You're so god-damn dumb, Rik. How do you even remember to breathe? Seriously. Do they give you some kind of breathing machine to make sure you don't forget?
That definition of equilibrium, like your neural pathways, is vastly oversimplified. When I talk about Universal equilibrium, I'm referring to a balance of ALL natural energy (temperature, charge, gravity, inertia, etc.). I'm not making reference to a balance between your imaginary friends, Yin and Yang.
Your previous post started with........There's no evidence that the Universe is a creation at all..........but wait a minute beanie.
In this universe there are things or elements as you mention (temperature, charge, gravity, inertia..) that
are not driven by a consciousness like in humans and then you got plants and animals that got a little bit of consciousness so everything in this universe follow different ways.
Animals are driven by instinct while elements in this universe such as space, air, light-energy, water and matter follow a different system.
Now when you say that .....There's no evidence that the Universe is a creation at all......
you also can not explain why a continuous transformation of elements lead to more consciousness.
When the consciousness get bigger like in humans the equilibrium that is part and parcel of lower type of consciousness and the five fundamental element that compose the universe doesn't apply anymore.
Humans want progress not equilibrium.
Let the equilibrium be part and parcel of the physical universe and progress part and parcel of intelligent humans.
Absolute word scrabble that means nothing, absolutely nothing.
