RE: What do christians have against gay people
January 13, 2011 at 8:34 am
(This post was last modified: January 13, 2011 at 8:47 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Dotard Wrote:"Abnormal" is an appropriate discriptor.
It depends whether you mean "abnormal" merely to mean "less usual" or whether you also mean "abnormal" in the sense of "weird". Weirdness is subjective, unusualness isn't.
Quote:Morality is subjective. My subjective morality, which is no more or less valid than yours, says it is immoral.
Since morality is subjective, that means that "morality" is identical to mere preferences of individuals, and since "mere preferences of individuals" is far from the definition of "morality", doesn't that suggest that subjective morality is identical to non-existent morality?
(In which case, I'm not talking about the alternative being immorality here (immorality implies the existence of morality) - I'm talking about the alternative being amorality).
I am anti-anti-homosexuality as I am anti-any-form-of-prejudice. This isn't a prejudice of mine, since nothing is prejudiced about being against prejudice.
Sometimes intolerance should be tolerated and other times it shouldn't, it depends on the degree of the intolerance and whether it's actually doing any harm. It also depends on the type of intolerance because there are actually two types of intolerance: there is 1. Resistant or active intolerance - and - 2. Avoidant or inactive intolerance. The former usually being a lot more potentially damaging than the latter. The latter often being quite harmless or completely harmless and able to tolerate.
