Scientism & Philosophical Arguments

[dyresand]

When I posted this in another thread, I got answers that ranged from a GIF laughing over and over, a suggestion that we need to look at the certain to be life on other planets and that this was simply a God of the Gaps argument. Can it really be dismissed so easily?

Premise One: Despite a thorough search, no material causes have been discovered that demonstrate the power to produce large amounts of specified information, irreducible and interdependent biological systems.
Premise Two: Intelligent causes have demonstrated the power to produce large amounts of specified information, irreducible and interdependent systems of all sorts.
Conclusion: Intelligent design constitutes the best, most causally adequate, explanation for the information and irreducible complexity in the cell, and interdependence of proteins, ...

Here is the problem and why i find it funny if believers/theists just wanting to throw god into places where he doesn't belong. 
When there is something scientifically we do not understand yet people throw god into that whole and that is why  i find it funny. Because
when it comes to god of the gaps generally speaking science between back then in our dark ages and now we know more now than back then.
Yet it still happens people throw a god(s) into something we don't know we have technology that rapidly advances and sooner rather than later we
get our answer.

Also intelligent design.. you really want to go that route? Saying that you would have downgraded everything we know of.
You can get life from non life you don't need a creator to make life.