two scientific miracles puzzled me?

[paulpablo]

1) Observation.
2) Observation.

/thread

i think that you are right because there are many scientific errors in the quran.
but the problem that confused me: if mohamed is the only man that observate these two phenomena or not?
because muslims could say that mohamed is the only man who said that the wind have a role in raising clouds and that there no year is rainfull than another  , so, it can't be an observation. because if it is an observation many others will have the same observation.
it's true that we can responding them by proving that there are many scientific errors in the quran.
but if we prove that there are another men that observate these two phenomena, we wil refute their claim completely.
so, i began my research, and i found that the romans philosoves thinks that the "Wind transported water to the clouds":
http://greenoakschurchofchrist.weebly.co..._cycle.pdf

Talking about the second phenomena, it just simply isn't true.  The amount of rainfall on earth isn't exactly the same each year.

Second of all the reasoning behind the miracle not being true in this case is very faulty.

How could Muhammad have observed that rainfall is the same each year globally before he even knows that America exists?

I agree it's not a miracle, BUT only on the basis that the amount of rainfall each year on earth isn't the same, but I disagree with the reasoning that it's not a miracle because Muhammad just observed this.