(December 21, 2015 at 7:14 am)truth search Wrote:(December 20, 2015 at 8:31 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: 1) Observation.
2) Observation.
/thread
i think that you are right because there are many scientific errors in the quran.
but the problem that confused me: if mohamed is the only man that observate these two phenomena or not?
because muslims could say that mohamed is the only man who said that the wind have a role in raising clouds and that there no year is rainfull than another , so, it can't be an observation. because if it is an observation many others will have the same observation.
it's true that we can responding them by proving that there are many scientific errors in the quran.
but if we prove that there are another men that observate these two phenomena, we wil refute their claim completely.
so, i began my research, and i found that the romans philosoves thinks that the "Wind transported water to the clouds":
http://greenoakschurchofchrist.weebly.co..._cycle.pdf
Better research, after 15 seconds on Google:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_o...#Antiquity
Observe discussions in India, 3000 BC, by those who understood, notwithstanding their incorrect idea on how, that the movement of the earth causes wind, which gives rise to clouds.
3000 BC was a very, very long time before Mohammad.
Bullshit busted, Mohammad really wasn't all that special.
Mr. Hanky loves you!