(December 23, 2015 at 11:55 am)orangebox21 Wrote:(December 23, 2015 at 3:03 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: orangebox21,That's what you wrote.
I specifically stated that Jesus which is not a man and hadn't been a man for over two thousand years is equal to the holy spirit.
"Jesus as a man is the son of God. In spirit it is the Holy Spirit" (Post #91).
I will ask you to please ask question without assuming things or putting words in my mouth.
(December 23, 2015 at 3:03 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: Why would you assume that I preach that Jesus was imperfect. On the contrary h was the only pure and without blimesh. Thought I wrote something along those lines but I have no problem with clarification.I didn't say that you were preaching that Jesus was imperfect I wrote:
Quote:So you're teaching that Jesus is an imperfect sacrifice(#94)?and I wrote that in response to post #91 when you wrote:
Quote:He is the propitiation to the Father and the payment for nearly all sin from any sinner.The only unforgiven sin is that of blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, on other words intentionally misdirecting.
I wasn't saying that the Christ isn't sufficient payment for all past sin, but that there is one sin that will allow you to not even be judged by Christ, but condemned without hearing or regard. It is equivalent to the sins of the fallen angels.
I don't know exactly what else it is you are trying to say exactly. There is one Christ and one way. I think you were asking if I personally thought if Jesus of Christ was, while in the flesh, and man the absolute equivalent to GOD, as opposed to the son of GOD, and man wholly perfect in God's will.
I don't know why that is were one draws the line, as it is stated repeatedly the the way is Jesus the Christ. I don't deny that at all. Technically I cannot justify limiting the abilities of God. With that being said; Jesus of Nazareth could have been GOD incarnate. But based on scripture, namely the Bible, he was the son, the propitiation, the lamb without flaw or blemish, without sin,
(December 23, 2015 at 3:03 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: You seem to be looking for a reason to divide yourself from what I say as opposed to uniting in Faith under God which we are told to do in scripture, so there you go.We are called to unite in in Christ. But what Christ? And what gospel? We are called to unite in truth. So far I am getting the impression that you are preaching a false Christ and a false gospel. I'm giving you the opportunity to clarify your position because I hope that I'm misunderstanding you and that we can live in unity. But if you are preaching another Christ or another gospel, then it is not my words but the Lord's when he says through Paul, let him [preaching another Christ or gospel] be anathema [separated from God] (Galatians 1:8). How can what is separated from God be united with him?
So please clarify "yes" or "no":
Is Jesus God?
Did Jesus come in the flesh (was He a man at the incarnation)?
Is Jesus still a man today?
Was Jesus resurrected from the dead?
Faith in selfless Unity for Good.