Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)

[Zen Badger]

What are you talking about? God's purpose in creation is to bring glory to Himself, period. As to this misconception that supernova remnants point to an old universe, nothing could be farther from the truth. Let's take a look at the numbers

Expected number of observable supernova remnants if the universe were billions of years old:

Stage 1: 2
Stage 2: 2260
Stage 3: 5000

Expected number of observable supernova remnants if the universe were only thousands of years old:

Stage 1: 2
Stage 2: 125
Stage 3: 0

Actual observable supernova remnants to date:

Stage 1: 5
Stage 2: 200
Stage 3: 0


So you can see, the actual observable data are far more in line with a young universe than an old one. Thanks for bringing the topic up!

As far as movement of galaxies, many spiral galaxies actually wind up too quickly in order to be billions of years old, so that
is pretty good young universe evidence too. Thanks for that one too!

Is thisthe source for your "facts"?
http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&source...zwnX-Pe7Rg

Well i'm sure we'll take that seriously

The point being that stellar evolution in a 6000 thousand year old universe would not have advanced far enough for there to be any remnents at all.So his figures are pure fantasy.

As to the old cretinist saw about galactic formation... try this

http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&source...6035ea4uew

Read down to galaxy formation.

BTW your reponse has NOTHING to do with my original point about colliding galaxies.
God is obviously so incompetent that he creates a universe and positions some galaxies that are crashing into each other, very, very glorious.

Still a fail buddy, an EPIC, EPIC fail.