The argument from woeful dribblyness:
1. God would arm his followers with the most convincing evidence and arguments to reward them for their faith, in order to convince unbelieving scum like me.
2. The faithful rely on special pleading, arguments from ignorance and have no evidence at all except waving their arms about and pointing at everything.
3. Therefor, God didn't give them what he would give them if he exists.
4. So no God, or else a God who doesn't want people to believe in him.
1. God would arm his followers with the most convincing evidence and arguments to reward them for their faith, in order to convince unbelieving scum like me.
2. The faithful rely on special pleading, arguments from ignorance and have no evidence at all except waving their arms about and pointing at everything.
3. Therefor, God didn't give them what he would give them if he exists.
4. So no God, or else a God who doesn't want people to believe in him.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum