Do humans always accept proofs when presented to them?

[abaris]

A lot of people argue on the lines of the following:

1. If there were proofs of a God, then everyone would believe in God.
2. Some people don't believe in God.
3. Therefore there aren't any proofs of God.

I've yet to find anyone saying Some people don't believe in god, therefore there aren't any proofs of god.

The reasoning is very different as you should well know, following this board. The evidence is piled up against the existence of any scripted, humanocentric god. Therefore that god concept is out of the window, unless he tried his hand as dinosaur god first, to move on to critter god, before graduating to mammal god. And then he specialised in being primate god until he finally found his one true passion in reveiling himself to a half nomadic bunch of desert dwellers some 3000 years ago. Oh, and in your case it's actually only some 1400 years with another bunch of half nomadic desert dwellers.

Makes sense, doesn't it?