No, I mean obviously not. Iraq was certainly better with him in place. He might have been an evil fuck, but what replaced him is far far worse.
He wasn't a threat to the US. He had no weapons of mass destruction and no means of making them very limited connection to terrorist organ, much less a system required to reach the US. Eventually he'd be out of power anyway. It pains me to say it, but the world would probably be better if he was still in charge of Iraq.
He wasn't a threat to the US. He had no weapons of mass destruction and no means of making them very limited connection to terrorist organ, much less a system required to reach the US. Eventually he'd be out of power anyway. It pains me to say it, but the world would probably be better if he was still in charge of Iraq.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)
