Whatever.
I'm wondering where the line between weak atheism and a thinner nuanced non-classical view of a personal cause is? Let's say the traditional family of arguments for the existence of a personal cause fail to support the classical theistic view but instead support a personal cause that is very much not like a human being. How is that different from any form of atheism?
I'm wondering where the line between weak atheism and a thinner nuanced non-classical view of a personal cause is? Let's say the traditional family of arguments for the existence of a personal cause fail to support the classical theistic view but instead support a personal cause that is very much not like a human being. How is that different from any form of atheism?
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
