RE: For those who want proof of the exodus
January 1, 2016 at 1:15 am
(This post was last modified: January 1, 2016 at 1:17 am by Minimalist.)
LOL. Well, it took another 7 minutes but at the 25 minute mark who does Mahoney introduce as his "savior?" David Rohl: Crackpot extraordinaire. I should make predictions for a living!
The problem with a bozo like drippy is that he willingly believes whatever the fuck he wants to believe and in response to my calling Rohl a crackpot or introducing reputable Eqyptologists to dispute his absurd nonsense he will simply stick his head up his ass and insist that everyone is against his new found messiah.
Fortunately, Rohl is such a shit that he has pissed off xtians, too.
So, even though I think these people are pushing a phony agenda, too, I will let them rip Rohl a new asshole.
Here you go, drippy. Just for you.
These are xtian shitheads tearing into your new hero.
http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/200...stine.aspx
Sucks to be you, drippy.
The problem with a bozo like drippy is that he willingly believes whatever the fuck he wants to believe and in response to my calling Rohl a crackpot or introducing reputable Eqyptologists to dispute his absurd nonsense he will simply stick his head up his ass and insist that everyone is against his new found messiah.
Fortunately, Rohl is such a shit that he has pissed off xtians, too.
So, even though I think these people are pushing a phony agenda, too, I will let them rip Rohl a new asshole.
Here you go, drippy. Just for you.
These are xtian shitheads tearing into your new hero.
http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/200...stine.aspx
Quote:CONCLUSION
It is abundantly clear that, from a Palestinian perspective, Rohl's hypothesis is quite unworkable. Rather than enhancing the connections between archaeology and the Bible, his new chronology would destroy the many strong correlations that exist when the standard chronology is followed.
Sucks to be you, drippy.