Young Earth Creationism Vs. Science (Statler Waldorf Contd)

[Zen Badger]

Incorrect, in a 6,000 year old universe we’d expect to observe roughly 125 stage 2 remnants, which we can observe around 200, pretty close prediction really. You are right, we would not expect to observe any stage 3 remnants in a 6,000 year old universe, it sure is a good thing we have not observed any huh?

Why would we expect to see this? Since stellar evolution takes millions of years to get from a stable star to a supernova. If the universe is only 6000 years old NO star will have had time to get to supernova stage, or red giant stage, or any other of the stages that come from being billions of years old.

And anisotropic light propagation is still a load of unfounded bollocks perpertrated to support the cretinist myth of a young universe.

Einstein might have considered it(a big might, I've seen no evidence that he did) but ultimately he rejected it. In fact until you spewed it up here I'd never even heard of it.

And colliding galaxies as evidence of gods glory???? yeah, whateva.......