My heart is breaking... I thought Christians are suppose to love "unconditionally"

[dyresand]

No, in every age there WERE guides, and only science has transcended. While all other "guides" worked to create social pecking orders, none of them produced unity outside the sect or umbrella organization.

Buddha is a "guide" to all Buddhists, but yet there are different sects. Christians see Jesus as a "guide" but yet there are different sects. Muslims see Allah and Mohammed as their "guide" but yet there are different sects. Yet computers exist in all the world to sell these old myths on.

Most humans have a religion, yes, but popularity does not equal unity. If popularity of belief was universal there would be one religion and no competing sect within that religion.

Why hasn't science produce a Guide to lead us the straight path if science transcends it? Or is that there is a straight path but no one in this age can walk it? Or has some walked it but none of them are going to guide us upon it? Or is it that there is no straight path because morality is just a concept in our heads?

Science is science it's always changing and always giving answers religion unlike science is static and never changing. We can prove religion to be wrong with but will it change no. We can prove bad science to be wrong will it change yes it does change. The only reason why people still hold a religion there is a variety of reasons but the majority of it is fear. You don't need a guide in the real world if you have questions science and logic will answer it.