Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Angrboda]

This is a false dichotomy.  The 'I' is part of the mind.

One more thing if you don't mind.
There is any difference between the mind and a storage of information?  

Yes, there is.

Oh, that is very interesting yog.
So the mind is not a storage of information and the I and the mind are the same thing.
So who store the information and who decide to get the information from where?
But wait a minute yog.
Everything is as one.
There is no difference between the I the mind and the place where the information are located.
Or not.?
Or yes.?
Oh, maybe?
Oh, yes is all very clear.
Oh, not nothing is clear.
But let us start from the beginning.
Suppose you start thinking.
Who start thinking other than you?
At this stage you decide to start thinking about something but that something is not yet in your mind
until you get into that storage of information so it is clear that the I and the storage of information are two separate things otherwise you wouldn't need to think.
Correct?
Now where that storage of information that is separate from the I suppose to be?
Up in the moon or inside your mind?
So if it is inside your mind it means that mind and the I are two separate things and your ideas are incorrect.  

You can't even get it correct when I spoon feed it to you. The 'I' and memory are separate functions of the mind, not necessarily separate parts. Indeed the memory would have to include parts of the 'I' or else there would be no transfer of information from the memory to the 'I', so they can't be entirely separate. What, do you think memories are shipped to the 'I' by postal delivery? No, part of the machinery of memory bridges into the 'I' to create the images of the past within it. And I never said that memory and the 'I' were not separate parts; that's some nonsense you added by mistaking the implication of certain granted differences.

What you wrote is complete bollocks.