RE: Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)
January 7, 2016 at 4:54 am
(This post was last modified: January 7, 2016 at 4:55 am by Little Rik.)
(January 6, 2016 at 7:13 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: The more I read about Bruce Lipton, the more obvious it becomes that he is nothing but a new age fraud. You couldn't have picked a more untrustworthy source for your information. He has a self-published book, The Biology of Belief: Unleashing the Power of Consciousness, Matter, & Miracles which apparently is little more than a marketing tool for an unproven therapy, PSYCH-K.
It's clear that you chose this source because it echoed what you wanted to hear, rather than because it is a reliable source. That's typical of your 'citations' -- you don't care whether it's likely to be true, only that it aligns with what you believe. This makes your 'researches' worthless as they are nothing but an exercise in confirmation bias.
You are an idiot, and your sources suck. And to think that you used to criticize me for using Wikipedia articles; what a hypocrite you are.
Imbecile.
Lipton has studied all his life on the subject.
He got several degree so he is an expert in his field.
It is natural that there is always someone who criticize someone else.
I guess that is also unloved by atheists as he was an atheist himself and become a theist after
studying how the cells work and have consciousness.
David Gorski is one of his critics.
But the game of criticize goes all around so also Gorski is criticized by someone else.
Gorsky is a fundamentalist of the first degree and by the way he is not an expert as Lipton in the field of
cells consciousness or not consciousness.
But let me say something about me criticize you for getting material from Wiki.
That rely to few years ago if i remember.
In that instance i ask you and other people about the meaning of philosophy and
i pointed out to express your opinion without you get information on the net or Wiki in that case.
It was when i realize that you took information from wiki that i criticize you.
So the point has really nothing to do with wiki being reliable or not but with the fact that you could not
express any thing of yours.
Comprende?
