(January 7, 2016 at 10:20 am)Drich Wrote:(January 6, 2016 at 12:22 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Example. You cannot move the reign of Ramesses II up by 300 years without also moving the Hittite Empire up by the same 300 years since they fought each other at Kadesh and identical copies of the peace treaty have been found in Egypt and Hatusa. But the Hittite Empire ceased to exist as a result of the depredations of the Sea People c 1190 BC and this is securely dated by non Egyptian or biblical means. Rohl does not give a flying fuck about that because all he is trying to do is give fools like you a reason to cling to your absurd exodus tale. He is a charlatan and has been denounced as a charlatan for a generation already.Again No! Closing the gap on the 2nd egyptian dark age from 400 to 100 years (a time where nothing was recorded/is lost historically so we can't possibly know exactly how long this age lasted) Does NOT affect the time of ramses and the third kingdom.
WHAT THE MOVIE YOU OLD GOAT! You sound like a moron and don't even know it! You keep bring up the same points and are either ignoring what I/the movie says or are too thick to understand the time shift the movie talks about happens before the third dynasty which is when Ramses lived!
When you make statements like this, Drich, it makes you sound like the one who didn't watch the movie. Yes the time shift does affect things in the final period, and that was explicitly stated in the film; they spent 5-10 minutes talking about it.