(January 7, 2016 at 9:56 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:Quote:It’s one thing to state that the historical exodus might have around two hundred years earlier (say, around 1450 B.C.), but it is quite another thing to give the reasoning as to why this was the case. This wasn’t made clear, and it certainly could have been.
Mahoney presented three dating options for consideration:The documentary did a good job of explaining the different views and opinions that scholars have on the biblical Exodus. But, as I’ve pointed out earlier it was unclear if any clear and defninitive answer was arrived at for when the Exodus actually occurred.
- The late date (1230 B.C.) – Israel Finkelstein, James K. Hoffmeier
- The early date (1446 B.C.) – Bryant Wood, Charles Ailing
- The New Revised Egyptian Chronology – David Rohl
CrossExamined.org | A Review of Patterns of Evidence: Exodus
Oh look, once again Drich is wrong!
how so?
I never said the movie did not provide alternitive dates, nor did i say it offered evidence to dispute those dates. I simply offered the information that the movie presents as the best canidate for the exodus.
Not to meantion I did indeed say that the dating of the exodus was only one aspect of this movie and that the movie provided much much more evidence than just the date.
So again how am I wrong? or is this just another vain attempt to dismiss the message by discrediting the messenger?