Listen, asshole.
When you have a PH D in Egyptology then you can tell them what they have to consider. Rohl's hypothesis is not new. He trotted it out over 20 years and was instantly dismissed as a fucking crackpot. His evidence then was laughable and he hasn't gotten much better.
These are people who have devoted their lives to studying these issues and in many cases are right down in the dirt digging up the artifacts. Some dilettante showed up with a camera and a fucking bible and I think the professionals were quite tolerant of his stupidity while telling him that he was barking up the wrong tree.
I feel no such urge to be polite.
Waving a fucking bible around is not impressive.
When you have a PH D in Egyptology then you can tell them what they have to consider. Rohl's hypothesis is not new. He trotted it out over 20 years and was instantly dismissed as a fucking crackpot. His evidence then was laughable and he hasn't gotten much better.
These are people who have devoted their lives to studying these issues and in many cases are right down in the dirt digging up the artifacts. Some dilettante showed up with a camera and a fucking bible and I think the professionals were quite tolerant of his stupidity while telling him that he was barking up the wrong tree.
I feel no such urge to be polite.
Waving a fucking bible around is not impressive.