(January 8, 2016 at 2:15 pm)Drich Wrote:(January 8, 2016 at 1:59 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: As a former Hindu, I can only say that this is simply wrong. I lack a belief in the existence of 'god', of 'gods', and I'm also mute on the subject of 'God'. I did not arrive at the same position as a former Christian might have by a "shared methodology".
So out of a complete vacuum you just stop believing in the hindu god or and God.
If this is the case then you are correct. You are a unique snowflake the world has never seen the likes of and shall never see again.
However if you used evidence based reasoning to come to a conclusion their isn't any god(s) then you are a conformist like your non hindu brethern.
Your fundamental dishonesty continues to amaze. I know damn well you have seen the difference between agnostic atheist and gnostic atheist explained, so your last sentence is either another of your straw men or incontrovertible evidence that your comprehension is close to nil.
And evidence-based reasoning is now conformity? Perhaps. Conformity to reality. But group think? That's your territory, Sport.
I suppose that means your fellow Christians, who believe on insufficient evidence (at least those who haven't risen to the self-serving standards you outline in your A/S/K talking points) are what -- mavericks because they don't care about good evidence?
